Locations using Panoptyc.
Comparison table
Panoptyc is the better solution based on accuracy, fewer false positives, and broader fraud coverage.
Make the decision obvious with a straight comparison: Panoptyc is more accurate, sends fewer false positives, catches more types of self-checkout and cashier fraud, and has a stronger track record across 25,000+ locations.
| Category | SAI | Panoptyc | Why Panoptyc wins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy |
×Accuracy depends on fit
SAI still has to prove accuracy inside each store environment.
|
✓More accurate signal
Panoptyc is built to keep reviews focused on real theft, not noise.
|
Better accuracy helps operators trust the system and act faster. |
| False positives |
×More review noise
Noisy detections create extra review work and reduce team confidence.
|
✓Fewer false positives
Cleaner alerts keep the review queue focused on high-signal incidents.
|
Fewer false positives means less wasted labor and cleaner operational follow-through. |
| Fraud coverage |
×Narrower coverage
A narrower detection model can miss practical theft patterns across lanes.
|
✓More theft types
Panoptyc catches more types of self-checkout and cashier fraud.
|
Broader fraud coverage matters when theft shows up in more than one pattern. |
| Track record |
×Smaller operating base
Less real-world operating data can make rollout decisions harder to trust.
|
✓25,000+ locations
Panoptyc has a larger deployment footprint and more operational data to work from.
|
A stronger track record gives buyers more confidence before rollout. |
Panoptyc is the more accurate option with fewer false positives, broader fraud coverage, and a stronger track record.
Proof
SEE HOW PANOPTYC STACKS UP.
Panoptyc catches more types of self-checkout and cashier fraud, keeps false positives low, and brings the advantage of a 25,000+ location footprint. That gives teams more confidence in the alerts they review.
Thefts caught per year.
Catches self-checkout and cashier fraud patterns.
False positives stay low for cleaner reviews.
Migration / switching offer
See what a more accurate rollout could look like.
Currently evaluating SAI? We will review your current fraud workflow, show where Panoptyc can reduce false positives, and map the theft types Panoptyc can catch across your lanes.
The audit keeps the conversation focused on accuracy, coverage, and track record instead of a generic vendor comparison.
What the audit covers
Offer
Offer
Review
Document the current setup, review workflow, and where false positives slow the team down.
Compare
Compare accuracy, self-checkout coverage, cashier fraud coverage, and operating footprint.
Activate
Move into a focused theft audit or demo with a clean rollout plan.
Switching offer
Panoptyc accuracy audit
We review the current setup and map the simplest path to Panoptyc, with the comparison centered on accuracy, false positives, fraud coverage, and track record.
- Current-state review.
- Migration plan.
- Rollout timing.
