Better positioned for budget-conscious rollouts.
Comparison table
Panoptyc is the better solution based on cost, accuracy, and automated case building.
Make the decision obvious with a straight comparison: Panoptyc is the lower-cost path with more accurate signal quality, fewer false positives, broader theft coverage, and a stronger operating footprint.
| Category | I3 International | Panoptyc | Why Panoptyc wins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost |
×Higher-cost path
A heavier system can create more implementation and ownership cost.
|
✓Lower-cost rollout
Panoptyc is easier to justify across multi-location deployments.
|
Lower total cost makes the decision easier and keeps rollout financially simple. |
| Accuracy |
×More signal risk
Accuracy still depends on how well the system handles each store environment.
|
✓More accurate signal
Panoptyc keeps reviews focused on real theft with fewer false positives.
|
Better accuracy improves trust and reduces wasted review time. |
| Fraud coverage |
×Narrower coverage
A narrower model can miss practical theft patterns across checkout workflows.
|
✓More theft types
Panoptyc catches more types of self-checkout and cashier fraud.
|
Broader fraud coverage matters when theft shows up across different workflows. |
| Track record |
×Less operating proof
A smaller footprint gives buyers less real-world proof before rollout.
|
✓25,000+ locations
Panoptyc has a stronger deployment footprint and more operating data to work from.
|
More operating history gives teams more confidence before they scale. |
Panoptyc is the lower-cost option with stronger accuracy, fewer false positives, broader fraud coverage, and a deeper operating track record.
Proof
SEE HOW PANOPTYC STACKS UP.
Panoptyc gives buyers a lower-cost path while keeping detection accurate, false positives low, and fraud coverage broad across self-checkout and cashier workflows.
Cleaner signal means fewer wasted reviews.
Catches self-checkout and cashier fraud patterns.
Locations using Panoptyc.
Migration / switching offer
See the lower-cost path to better signal quality.
Currently evaluating I3 International? We will review your current setup, compare cost and signal quality, and map where Panoptyc can catch more fraud with fewer false positives.
The audit keeps the comparison focused on cost, accuracy, fraud coverage, and rollout confidence.
What the audit covers
Offer
Offer
Review
Document your current system, cost drivers, review workflow, and coverage gaps.
Compare
Compare cost, accuracy, false positives, self-checkout fraud, and cashier fraud coverage.
Activate
Move into a theft audit or demo with a clear lower-cost rollout plan.
Switching offer
Panoptyc migration audit
We review the current setup and map the simplest path to Panoptyc, with the comparison centered on cost, accuracy, fraud coverage, and track record.
- Current-state review.
- Migration plan.
- Rollout timing.
