Catches broader theft patterns across lanes.
Comparison table
Panoptyc is the better solution based on broader theft coverage, fewer false positives, and automated case building.
Make the decision obvious with a straight comparison: Panoptyc catches more types of theft and turns reporting into a case-building workflow, not a loose stream of disconnected alerts.
| Category | Edgify | Panoptyc | Why Panoptyc wins |
|---|---|---|---|
| Theft coverage |
×Narrower alert set
Disconnected alert categories can miss practical theft patterns operators care about.
|
✓More theft types
Panoptyc catches more types of self-checkout, cashier, and operational theft.
|
Broader theft coverage helps teams see more of the loss picture. |
| Reporting |
×Disconnected alerts
Alerts are harder to act on when the reporting does not help the team build a case.
|
✓Case-ready structure
Panoptyc reporting is organized around building cases and supporting follow-through.
|
Case-building reporting gives operators a clearer path from detection to action. |
| False positives |
×More review noise
Noisy alerts make it harder to separate real incidents from low-value signals.
|
✓Cleaner review queue
Panoptyc keeps false positives low so teams can focus on real theft.
|
Cleaner signal quality makes the reporting workflow easier to trust. |
| Track record |
×Less store-proven context
A smaller operating footprint gives teams less proof before rollout.
|
✓25,000+ locations
Panoptyc has a stronger deployment footprint and more theft data to work from.
|
A larger footprint helps Panoptyc improve coverage and reporting with more real-world context. |
Panoptyc catches more types of theft and gives teams reporting that supports case building, not just alert review.
Proof
SEE HOW PANOPTYC STACKS UP.
Panoptyc is built for operators who need to catch more theft patterns and turn detections into usable cases. The result is broader coverage, cleaner review queues, and reporting that supports action.
Reporting is structured to build cases.
Locations using Panoptyc.
Thefts caught per year.
Migration / switching offer
See how case-ready reporting changes the workflow.
Currently evaluating Edgify? We will review your alert workflow, identify where theft patterns are getting separated, and show how Panoptyc organizes detections into cleaner cases.
The audit keeps the comparison focused on theft coverage, reporting structure, and operational follow-through.
What the audit covers
Offer
Offer
Review
Map the current alert workflow and where incidents become hard to connect.
Compare
Compare theft coverage, reporting structure, and case-building workflow.
Activate
Move into a theft audit or demo with a clear reporting rollout plan.
Switching offer
Panoptyc reporting audit
We review the current setup and map how Panoptyc can catch more theft types while turning alerts into a case-building workflow.
- Current-state review.
- Migration plan.
- Rollout timing.
